Skip to main content
Business Observer Friday, Dec. 26, 2003 18 years ago

On the Upside (Tampa cover)

Chambers of commerce throughout the Gulf Coast region mostly agree on the important issues for the upcoming legislative session: Affordable health insurance, education and transportation.

On the Upside

Chambers of commerce throughout the Gulf Coast region mostly agree on the important issues for the upcoming legislative session: Affordable health insurance, education and transportation.

By David R. Corder

Associate Editor

Mark Flynn has some good news. The point man for the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce on legislative issues sees brighter days ahead on matters that affect business. He is far more optimistic about opportunities for legislative reform during the state's upcoming session. He also thinks there will be more money to spend on economic development.

For one, the state spent only $310 million out of a $950 million federal economic stimulus package this fall as seed money to finance the planned Scripps Research Institute in Palm Beach County, says Flynn, who chairs the Tampa chamber's state issues committee. Then the federal government reduced the state's Medicaid commitment by about $400 million. And documentary stamp tax collections are up on real estate transactions.

"So there will be new dollars," says Flynn, who also lobbies on behalf of groups such as the Tampa Bay Partnership and Tampa Port Authority in his capacity as vice president of government affairs at Hill & Knowlton Inc.

That's a far better picture than the one the state Legislature painted early this year, Flynn says. During the 2003 legislative session, for instance, The Legislature appropriated $84 million for economic development programs. It appropriated $127 million the year before.

"From $127 million to $84 million, that's huge," he says. "That's $40 million. That's a lot of money. We had a market fund program that started just two years ago. It was eliminated."

With looming state deficits, the budget axe also fell on economic development incentives such as the Qualified Target Industry tax refund program and the Economic Development Transportation Fund.

"The transportation outreach program has basically been eliminated," Flynn says. "I'm told that money went to fund the classroom size amendment."

But Flynn says the effect of the one-time budget cuts earlier this year could still impede long-term economic development efforts.

"Over the past couple of years, with the economy the way it's been, if anything brings us to the table with a little more anxiety, it's talking about budget issues," Flynn says. "We've all seen in the last couple of years worthwhile programs cut in areas across the board. Optimistically, we're on the upside of the valley so to speak, but some of the programs that have been cut may never recover. It's going to be a long road back."


But the road back may not be as rocky as chambers throughout the Gulf Coast and elsewhere rally around common causes.

Tim Clarke, for instance, looks at California and knows what he doesn't like about Florida politics. The Sarasota-based advertising and public relations executive counts himself among a throng of businesspeople concerned with what he considers the proliferation of unreasonable and costly constitutional amendments.

Only now the issue has become even more important to Clarke as chairman of the Greater Sarasota Chamber of Commerce. It's also an issue that has galvanized this chamber's membership with other business advocates throughout the Gulf Coast region in advance of the 2004 legislative session.

"There is probably more of a deeper interest this year in statewide issues," Clarke says about the Sarasota chamber membership. "The most disturbing issue is the growth of the constitutional amendment initiatives. People are very concerned. We see what happened in California, and we're concerned that Florida may be going down that same path."

Such unanimity doesn't come perchance, either, says Paul Ledford, chief lobbyist for the Florida Chamber of Commerce. It's the result of a concerted effort to galvanize the state's local chambers into a single influential voice.

About three years ago, the state chamber introduced the Florida Chamber Federation as part of an overall goal to improve relations between the state and local chambers.

In many states, Ledford says, the state chamber typically feuds with local chambers over key contributors - typically the largest, most-influential business leaders. He says the Florida Chamber favors more cooperative ventures with the local chambers and less competition for donations. Now the federation includes as members 118 local chambers throughout the state.

"That's the distribution network for our advocacy programs," says Ledford, the state chamber's senior vice president of public policy. "It's all new within the last three years. It's just starting to gain strength and momentum. And the legislators are starting to connect the dots between the local chambers and the Florida Chamber."

Still independent

The effectiveness of the federation also is evident in the legislative priorities adopted this year by other Gulf Coast business advocates such as the Clearwater Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Manatee Chamber of Commerce. Each ranks the constitutional amendment issue among its list of priorities for the 2004 legislative session.

It is certain the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce and the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce will include constitutional amendment reform when their boards meet next month to adopt a 2004 legislative priority list.

"On some issues, we're definitely the foot soldiers for the Florida chamber, and will continue to serve in that role," Flynn says.

That's not to mean in any way these local business advocates will abandon their independence. For instance, the state chamber ranks constitutional amendments, education and work force training issues and insurance reform as its top three priorities.

At the Sarasota chamber, however, the constitutional amendment issue ranked only fifth on its priority list. Instead, the local chamber membership wants the Legislature to repeal a change from this year that allows public high school students to graduate with 18 credits instead of 24. Members say such a variance will have a negative impact on work force development.

Then the Sarasota membership turned its attention to arts funding, a critical component of a healthy Sarasota's tourism industry. Statewide arts funding fell quickly under the budget axe during the prior legislative session.

Cost and availability of health insurance ranked third on the Sarasota chamber's list.

The Sarasota members expressed very little dissent about the ranking or the content of the list, says Clarke, chief executive officer of Clarke Advertising & Public Relations Inc. In fact, he formed a definite opinion about this year's ranking process. "It was the unanimous feeling the members who participated had about the platform," he says. "There really wasn't a lot of disagreement or differing views."

At the Manatee chamber, the membership adopted health care and other insurance reforms as top priorities. Constitutional amendments and education issues ranked second and third.

Just as its neighboring business advocates, the Manatee chamber expressed dismay at the increasing inability of its small-business members to afford health insurance. Following the state chamber's lead, the local chamber wants the Legislature to abandon policies that place mandates on benefits and providers but instead allow voluntary options on health care coverage.

"I can't remember a time when they were so engaged as they were this year," says Neil Spirtas, the Manatee chamber's vice president of public affairs, about the membership's participation in this year's legislative lobbying effort.

Differences exist

In Pinellas County, the two largest business advocates only partially agree on the legislative issues that affect their members the most.

Although currently compiling its priority list, the St. Petersburg chamber leans toward affordable health care insurance as the No. 1 legislative issue. The Clearwater chamber ranks insurance issues as sixth.

"We have the second most mandated coverage of any state in the union," says Russ Sloan, the St. Petersburg chamber's chief executive officer. "What maybe we want to do is this: If you want to stay with mandated health care coverage, fine; but then have (another) policy with the same coverage but with higher levels of deductible. Maybe what we need is a plan where there is one level that provides basic coverage and link that with catastrophic policy coverage with a higher deductible. The combination of those two may make it more affordable."

The Clearwater chamber - with its white sandy beaches and hospitality as its dominant industry - ranks tourism as its No. 1 priority. "Each local geographic area has its own sense of priority," says Ray Ferrara, chief executive officer of ProVise Management Group LLC and the Clearwater chamber's chairman. "One of ours, obviously, is getting money for tourism."

But the ranking does not diminish the Clearwater chamber's concern about insurance issues.

"We would love to see a law that would permit the chamber to act as an association and to be able to provide group health insurance to our members," Ferrara says. "We also want the Legislature to continue to focus on malpractice insurance. They took a reasonable first step during the special session (this fall), but it is clearly far from the last step. That's a good example of a common problem we would all share."

While they might differ on their rankings, both of the Pinellas chambers share one common concern - transportation. Each chamber thinks the county deserves more state transportation dollars, even though the county has yet to exhaust alternative funding through the local option gasoline tax.

Voters there recently rejected a 3-cent increase in the Pinellas local option gasoline tax. While the Clearwater chamber supported the measure, the St. Petersburg chamber didn't issue an opinion either way.

"Pinellas County is in sort of a 'Catch 22,' " Sloan says. "On the one hand, some of the legislators say (the county) hasn't maxed out the gas tax. 'So you can't expect more money if you haven't maxed out the gas tax.' But what they're not considering is the Penny for Pinellas (tax), which funded the Bayside Bridge project. We have voted to help ourselves. I think our Penny for Pinellas road project needs to be viewed in the same light as if we upped the gas tax."

Related Stories